Last Tuesday Barack Hussein Obama dismissively chided John McCain’s assertions that Obama is a communist.  His scoffing statement went something like this, “Pretty soon you’ll here John McCain accuse me of being a communist because I shared my peanut butter and jelly sandwich with someone back in kindergarten.”

Now just how stupid is Obama?  We’re not talking about HIS PB&J, we’re talking about YOUR and MY PB&J (and ‘Joe’ the Plumber’s too).  Obama came right out in front of God and everyone and said to Joe that he wants to take Joe’s (and your and my) money and give it to someone else.  This is a blanket redistribution of wealth.  They aren’t really talking about taking gobs of liquid cash from billionaires and giving it to the poor or even middle class as they would assert, they are talking about your and my hard-earned dollars on which we support ourselves and our families.  They want to take it from you and me (and Joe), and give it to someone else for no other reason than some cocked-up idea that spreading it around is a noble idea.  Well it’s not.  The right to work and earn and keep is a noble idea.  Charity and compassion are noble ideas.  Government high-jacking of our earnings is not.  If Obama want to share his sandwich with others, that his perrogative.  But he won’t beacause he won’t even help his own brother or his own aunt who are living in squaller.  No indeed, he wants to take what we earn and share it with whom he choses.

Well I say, “Not my PB&J!”

Radical and Right

Red State Radical

PS Frankly, let the Billionaires have their money.  It’s a foolish notion to claim that somehow the sheer fact that they have more money than you or I is somehow wrong.  This is a lie that the socialist pruport to get you to vot for them.  Unless they stole it, they have someone earned or inherited it through some device or labor.  Good for them!  The only reason the average person plays into the social crank is envy, plain, old sinful envy.  They wish they were the billionaire, and since they aren’t, they don’t want anyone else to be either.  If left alone, eventually a billionarie will invest, which creates jobs, and by virtual of work and earning, the wealth DOES get spread around in a noble fashion.

From my radical wife.

“My son, fear the Lord & the king; DO NOT ASSOCIATE WITH THOSE GIVEN TO CHANGE;  for their calamity will rise suddenly and who knows the ruin those two can bring?”  Proverbs 24:21-22

(calamity in the original language is in the context “of nation”)

Radical and Right

Red State Radical

What more information do we need? Barack Hussein Obama has clear ties to Marxist philosophy and openly admits he wants to practice socialistic redistribution of wealth. What many don’t seem to realize is that he’s talking about your wealth, your wages, your property.

http://elections.foxnews.com/2008/10/28/obama-affinity-marxists-dates-college-days/

This man’s core values are at emnity with democracy. He is against the freedoms we enjoy that are granted in the Constitution. Recently he has been coming out and saying so. How then can this man vie for the Presidency where he has to swear and oath to protect and defend the Constitution from all enemies both foreign and domestic? How can we let him by voting for him? If he took the oath of office, he’d be lying, he’d have to fire himself, he’d have to be impeached for treason.

The Bolsheviks of Russia were revolutionaries who fought against what they termed the capitalist oppression of the czarist regime.  Sound familiar? They claimed to be the party of the people.  Sound familiar?  They used unethical and illegal means to seize power.  Sound familiar?  Once they attained power, they shut out the little guy, the worker, the people and established a totalitarian elitist regime of themselves and no one else.  They oppressed the little guy, the worker, the people through high taxes in the name of fairness.  They redistributed the wealth of the worker.  They silence and even ‘eliminate’ those who speak against and oppose their ideas and call it “speaking with one voice”  THAT SOUNDS FAMILIAR because that’s exactly what Barack Hussein Obama and the democrats are all about.

Notwithstanding volitional charity to the truly needy, there’s no justice or fairness in stealing from someone who’s earned it and giving it to someone who has not.  That’s a jack.

Sources:

http://elections.foxnews.com/2008/10/28/obama-affinity-marxists-dates-college-days/

Radical and Right

Red State Radical

Ice, Ice Baby… as Al Gore tramps around obtaining awards and rock star status for perpetrating his unscientific lies about global warming, something too big to ignore is creeping up on him and the rest of us on this planet.  The arctic ice cap has grown by 27% this year which is a all-time high record even since they’ve started paying attention to it. (1)

When looking at the whole subject of global warming, we must take into context an even broader view than just the globe.  We must consider a more significant source of heat than smoke stacks.  We need ot consider ‘celestial warming’.

Read the rest of this entry »

I am tired of hearing some particular dishonest claims purported by Barack Hussein Obama regarding the economy.  So let’s set the record straight.

His first claim accuses John McCain as being responsible for American jobs being shipped off to China.  After making this specious claim, he then rallies the crowd by saying “we need to get those jobs back”.  It is true that a lot of our manufacturing jobs have been shipped to China.  What is false about his claim is who is really responsible.  A number of years ago China was granted MFN (Most Favored Nation) trading status.  This status was not merely allowed, it was brokered, lobbied for, and pushed.  This was done by a President prior to the current Whitehouse Administraion.  In fact, it was done by none other than William Jefferson Clinton.

The second claim that Barack Hussein Obama makes is that the credit crisis was caused by the “Bush economic policies” and he ties John McCain to those policies.  The fact is that these bad loans were forced by governmental policy in the “Community Reinvestment Act”.  This act was not merely allowed, it was brokered, lobbied for, and pushed by none other than William Jefferson Clinton.  Banks were told that they must give out these loans to people who could not afford to make the payments.  Their goal was to artificially boost up minorities in key areas, and they claimed that if banks did not provide these loans, they were racist.  The fact is, giving out a loan has nothing to do with race, and has everything to do with risk.  Color of skin does not matter, cash flow does.  Now that things in the economy have gotten tight, people who could not or barely could pay these mortgages are now defaulting, and banks are suffering.  To add insult to injury banking industry accounting regulation came out that made it so that banks can not list houses that they have repossessed as assets if houses aren’t selling in the area.  This is called “mark to market”.  It makes no sense, and these two problems together have put financial institutions in an artificial credit crisis.  This account regulation was perpetrated on us by none other than William Jefferson Clinton.

On this subject, some have claimed that many lenders made loans that were “predatory” in nature with high interest rates, and irregular payment plans.  In some cases this is true.  Many were, and bear an ethical responsibility.  However, it should be considered in the abstract it is common practice to evaluate the risk of a loan applicant, and based on credit risk assign varying rates.  Higher rates are given to those of higher risk.  This is sound fiscal practice on the part of any lending institution.  But even with this consideration, gouging is flat wrong.  Unfortunately because of regulatory pressure, banks were forced to take on risky loans and had to deal with them in some way.

Couple all this with the fact that for the past 3 years, liberal democrats have chaired the congressional committees that have oversight on the banking industries.  They are the oes who effect regulatory law.  They are the ones who stood by and did nothing but watch the snake keep eating its tail.

By understanding these facts, one should realize that it is the failed liberal economic policies that have gotten us to where they are.  Many people thought that Bill Clinton was just great with economic policy, and aside from his obvious ethical flaws, he was a great president.  But when you examine what he did with the economy was spread out our debt payments.  Coupling this with China MFN and the CRA, this mean he first refinance us, then sold us out.  Oh yeah, he also raised taxes.  In a word, he “cooked the books”.  As the CEO of our country he set a bad example to other CEO’s who did the same, and we had many companies like Enron exposed only after better accountability policies were implemented by the Bush administration.  We can’t afford to have more of the same liberal economic philosophy in Washington.   Not only do we not want Barack Hussein Obama in the Whitehouse, we don’t want anyone else supporting liberal economics anywhere in Washington leadership.

Vote smart folks.  “We the People” are the ones who have the power to save the economy by getting people in leadership who will get their hands out of our pockets so that we are free the work and prosper.  The only aspect in which they should be involved is to establish rule of law to make sure that no one gets taken advantage of.  We need to elect people that do not tax and redistribute.  That’s called socialism. It is not the governement’s place to guarantee happiness, just to ensure that we are free to pursue it.

Radical and Right

Red State Radical

ARE WE STUPID OR WHAT?

It makes you wonder…who is stupid or just doesn’t get it??

This email has three parts…longer than most, but worth the read.

Part 1:
Remember the election in 2006?

Thought you might like to read the following:

A little over one year ago:
1) Consumer confidence stood at a 2 1/2 year high;
2) Regular gasoline sold for $2.19 a gallon;
3) The unemployment rate was 4.5%.

Since voting in a Democratic Congress in 2006 we have seen:
1) Consumer confidence plummet;
2) The cost of regular gasoline soar to over $4.10 a gallon;
3) Unemployment is up to 5% (a 10% increase);
4) American households have seen $2.3 trillion in equity value
evaporate (stock and mutual fund losses);
5) Americans have seen their home equity drop by $1.2 trillion dollars;
6) 1% of American homes are in foreclosure.
7) Food prices skyrocketing over 30% in 1 year.

America voted for change in 2006, and we got it!

Remember, it is CONGRESS that makes the laws and spends our money
-not the President. He has to work with what’s handed to him.

Read the rest of this entry »

I nor do many people care about the color of Barak Hussein Obama’s skin.  It’s completely irrelevant, at least to most thinking people.  Color does appear to matter to he and his constituents, and oddly enough that makes them racist buy their own definition of the term.  What I am most concerned about is his character which leaves much to be desired, so much so that I believe it is a threat to our nation’s security and well-being if he were to become president. Even now there are people working for him who would try to snuff these words I am speaking by threats, intimidation, and abuse of power. Ironically this is all coming from those who are self-proclaimed defenders of free speech. Fascist cretins!

The following flash presentation illustrates his racism, radical socialist ties, and terrorist ties. These arguments are not merely hearsay or rumor, they are verifiable facts that are constantly downplayed by the left-wing pundits and the liberal media. If the reverse were true of a conservative candidate, you’d hear no end of the matter until the individual was sufficiently beaten into the shadows and out of their political career. The liberals know this, and commit a steely grin to themselves knowing that they have sufficiently manipulated things to work in their favor like this.